Archdiocese of Los Angeles ACCUSED PRIESTS
The Archdiocese of Los Angeles has made headlines for the child sex abuse allegations and settlements it has paid out. The Archdiocese of Los Angeles includes the counties of Los Angeles, Santa Barbara, and Ventura. As the country’s most populous diocese, with more than 3 million parishioners, the archdiocese has been hit with numerous lawsuits alleging child sexual abuse by priests. Since 2002, around 1,000 people have brought civil lawsuits against the Roman Catholic Church based on child sexual abuse claims in California. Â
In 2006, the archdiocese paid a $60 million settlement to settle 46 civil lawsuits based on priest sexual abuse. In 2007, the archdiocese paid to settle around $660 million to 508 victims of child sexual abuse in one of the largest child sexual abuse settlements in the United States. The claims alleged abuse that began in the 1940s. The agreement settled all pending pedophilia lawsuits, and it prevented then-Cardinal Roger Mahoney from having to testify about how the church handled sexual abuse allegations between 1940 and the 1990s.
In 2014, the archdiocese settled a final group of 17 civil lawsuits alleging child sexual abuse amounting to $13 million. Eleven of the lawsuits alleged abuse by a predator priest who later fled to his home country of Mexico. Prompting the settlement was a court order requiring the archdiocese to release files showing that it had engaged in a major cover-up, which included ordering church officials not to turn over names of altar boys being investigated by police in relation to the abuse allegations.Â
In November 2018, the archdiocese released a list of clergy that it deemed had been credibly accused of child sexual abuse. The list included a total of 296 clergy members.Â
In January 2020, the archdiocese settled a child sexual abuse case involving allegations of a former priest for $1.9 million. The lawsuit alleged that priest Lawrence Lovell, who was convicted in 2003 of child molestation and sentenced to 14 years in prison, molested an altar boy from 1982 to 1984 while serving at the San Gabriel Mission Church. Lovell was one of seven priests to be indicted on sex abuse charges in Maricopa County on charges of sex abuse.Â
According to the civil lawsuit, the victim reported Lovell’s abuse about six years after it started. The church paid for six months of counseling for the victim before he was placed in a hospital for suicide prevention treatment. Unknown at the time was the fact that, in 1986, Lovell had been convicted of sexually molesting a 14-year-old boy while he was assigned to a parish in Los Angeles. The church removed him from the ministry and put him on three years of probation. Lovell was allowed to continue serving as a priest, and he was later assigned to Sacred Heart Parish in Prescott, Arizona. In 2003, he was indicted on sexual abuse charges while serving there. Lovell’s case is just one of many cases in which predator priests were moved from parish to parish, given counseling, and deemed fit to continue working as priests despite that they continued their pedophiliac conduct.
Whether you or a loved one experienced child sexual abuse recently or decades ago, you may be able to pursue legal action in California today. Since California enacted its new statute of limitations and lookback window, many victims have come forward, telling their stories and fighting for justice. The lookback window allows victims to file a civil claim against the perpetrator and the institution that allowed the abuse, no matter how old they are or how long ago the abuse happened. However, the deadline to file a claim is on January 1, 2023.
No one should have to go through the horrifying experience of child sexual abuse. Our legal team at Herman Law is ready to fight for your rights. Contact us today to learn about how we can help you and receive a free case evaluation.
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1970
Status:Â Charged
Ordained:
Status:Â Convicted
Ordained:Â 1995
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1979
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1967
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1969
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â OFM Cap
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:
Status: Accused
Ordained:Â 1936
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1954
Status:Â Settled
Order:Â OFM
Status:Â Sued
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1974
Status:Â Convicted
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1938
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1982
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:Â 1963
Status:Â Convicted
Ordained:Â 1975
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â OFM
Ordained:Â 1980
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:Â 1986
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1954
Status:Â Convicted
Order:Â OCarm
Ordained:Â 1975
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1956
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1949
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1932
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â SDB
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â OCarm
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:Â 1955
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1951
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â OFM
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1960
Status:Â Settled
Order:Â OFM
Ordained:Â 2021
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:Â 1971
Status:Â Settled
Order:Â CM
Ordained:Â 1969
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 2015
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1960
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â OFM
Ordained:Â 1963
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:Â 1967
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â SSCC
Ordained:Â 1960
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â CM
Ordained:Â 1932
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1946
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â OP
Ordained:Â 1948
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1975
Status:Â Accused
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â OFM
Ordained:Â 1956
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:Â 1941
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1943
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1940
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1955
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1957
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1972
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1947
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1973
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1961
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1974
Status:Â Convicted
Ordained:Â 1989
Status:Â Charged
Ordained:Â 1955
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:Â 1967
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1939
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â CSC
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1957
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1967
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â ST
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1956
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1942
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1978
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â CSsR
Ordained:Â 2000
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â CSC
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1976
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:Â 1939
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1925
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1961
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1934
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â CSC
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1932
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1961
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1983
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1990
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1927
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â SDB
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â SJ
Ordained:Â 1928
Status:Â Settled
Order:Â CPPS
Ordained:Â 1955
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1963
Status:Â Arrested
Ordained:Â 1985
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1951
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1955
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1973
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1972
Status:Â Convicted
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1954
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1976
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â SSCC
Ordained:Â 1963
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1966
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:Â 1928
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1991
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â OP
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1966
Status:Â Settled
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1958
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1994
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1963
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1927
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:Â 1981
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1984
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1943
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1942
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â OFM
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1963
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:Â 1950
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1961
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:Â 1958
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1945
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1956
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1954
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â SM
Ordained:Â 1963
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:Â 1950
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:Â 1972
Status:Â Convicted
Ordained:Â 1955
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:Â 1982
Status:Â Convicted
Ordained:Â 1980
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1968
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1949
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1946
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1939
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1928
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â CSC
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â CMI
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1975
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â OFM Cap
Ordained:Â 1976
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:Â 1972
Status:Â Indicted
Order:Â SDB
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â OFM
Ordained:Â 1984
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â SDB
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1980
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â OFM
Ordained:Â 1974
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1973
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â OFM Cap
Ordained:Â 1968
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â OPraem
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1942
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:Â 1950
Status:Â Convicted
Ordained:Â 1968
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1950
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â CSJ
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1964
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â OSM
Ordained:Â 1972
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â OPraem
Ordained:Â 1937
Status:Â Arrested
Order:Â OFM
Ordained:Â 1982
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1995
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â OFM Cap
Ordained:Â 1933
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â CMF
Status:Â Settled
Order:Â SJ
Ordained:Â 1976
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:Â 1974
Status:Â Settled
Order:Â CSsR
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1976
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â CMF
Ordained:Â 1963
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 2000
Status:Â Convicted
Order:Â SDB
Ordained:Â 1951
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â CMF
Ordained:Â 1951
Status:Â Convicted
Ordained:Â 1958
Status:Â Settled
Order:Â OP
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1927
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1962
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â SJ
Ordained:Â 1960
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1959
Status:Â Charged
Ordained:Â 1934
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â SDB
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â OMI
Ordained:Â 1968
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:Â 1980
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:Â 1959
Status:Â Settled
Order:Â CM
Ordained:Â 1958
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1996
Status:Â Charged
Ordained:Â 1945
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1946
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1948
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1965
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â OFM
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â CFC
Status:Â Settled
Order:Â OP
Ordained:Â 1943
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â SM
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1954
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1943
Status:Â Settled
Order:Â OFM
Ordained:Â 1952
Status:Â Settled
Order:Â SJ
Ordained:Â 1962
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â OAR
Ordained:Â 1983
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1977
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â CSC
Ordained:Â 1945
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1955
Status:Â Settled
Order:Â CM
Ordained:Â 1963
Status:Â Convicted
Ordained:Â 1938
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1951
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â OSA
Ordained:Â 1940
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â BSFC
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1981
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â SDB
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1930
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â OMI
Ordained:Â 1936
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1973
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1990
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1977
Status:Â Settled
Order:Â SSJ
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1940
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1961
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1922
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1955
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1923
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:Â 1924
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1954
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â OP
Ordained:Â 1985
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â SSCC
Ordained:Â 1961
Status:Â Settled
Order:Â SJ
Ordained:Â 1943
Status:Â Accused
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1968
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â OFM
Ordained:Â 1974
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:Â 1976
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1990
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1973
Status:Â Settled
Order:Â OFM Conv
Ordained:Â 1965
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â OFM
Ordained:Â 1975
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â SchP
Status:Â Charged
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1973
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1979
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1939
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1972
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1970
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1962
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1965
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1985
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1963
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â OP
Ordained:Â 1928
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1936
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â OFM Cap
Ordained:Â 1957
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1966
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1958
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1959
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1978
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1970
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1971
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â CSC
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â CM
Ordained:Â 1986
Status:Â Convicted
Ordained:Â 1966
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1966
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1970
Status:Â Convicted
Order:Â CMF
Ordained:Â 1968
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1964
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1953
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1946
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:Â 1936
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1942
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1984
Status:Â Accused
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â SchP
Ordained:Â 1984
Status:Â Convicted
Order:Â OAR
Ordained:Â 1916
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1983
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1996
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â SDB
Ordained:Â 1957
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1954
Status:Â Settled
Order:Â CSC
Status:Â Settled
Order:Â SchP
Ordained:Â 1969
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â MSC
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â CFC
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â OMI
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â OFM
Ordained:Â 1927
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1925
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:Â 1939
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:
Status:Â Convicted
Order:Â OSM
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1943
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1981
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1951
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1961
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â MSpS
Ordained:Â 1978
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1943
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1981
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1962
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1985
Status:Â Settled
Order:Â OCarm
Ordained:Â 1954
Status:Â Arrested
Ordained:
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:Â 1967
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1969
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â SJ
Ordained:Â 1944
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1958
Status:Â Arrested
Ordained:Â 1979
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1959
Status:Â Settled
Order:Â SVD
Ordained:Â 1975
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1931
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1978
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â OFM
Status:Â Settled
Order:Â SVD
Ordained:Â 1954
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1991
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:
Status:Â Settled
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1971
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1973
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â OCarm
Status:Â Settled
Order:Â OFM
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â SDB
Status:Â Sued
Order:Â CP
Ordained:Â 1938
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1957
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1941
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1956
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â SVD
Ordained:Â 1969
Status:Â Reinstated
Ordained:
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1966
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1941
Status:Â Accused
Order:Â OSB
Ordained:Â 1936
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1966
Status:Â Convicted
Ordained:Â 1988
Status:Â Sued
Ordained:Â 1962
Status:Â Convicted
Order:Â OFM
Ordained:Â 1980
Status:Â Convicted
Ordained:Â 1965
Status:Â Accused
Ordained:Â 1967
Status:Â Sued
All Consultations are FREE and Confidential
* REQUIRED INFORMATION