Free CASE REVIEWS
1 800 686 9921
Free CASE REVIEWS
1 800 686 9921
Father Daniel M. Graham was first accused in 1988 of repeatedly molesting a 14-year-old boy. Graham admitted the sexual abuse allegations were true but received a positive assessment and was allowed to return to ministry. A second allegation emerged in 1992 regarding abuse that had occurred in the 1980s, resulting in restrictions on his ministry that were later removed in 1996.
Graham was placed on administrative leave in February 2002 as the clergy sexual abuse crisis in the Boston Archdiocese came to a head. He was living in Quincy, Massachusetts as of October 2008. According to the Boston Archdiocese’s August 2022 list, Graham remained on administrative leave at that time with canonical proceedings still in process. Graham died in October 2023, with his case unresolved at the time of his death.
With decades of dedicated advocacy, we have held abusers and institutions accountable, helping survivors secure justice and the resources to move forward.
For over two decades, we have focused solely on advocating for survivors, combining legal skill with compassion to guide them toward justice and healing.
We are honored to have guided thousands of survivors through the legal process, offering support, advocacy, and the resources they need to reclaim their lives.
The case of Father Daniel M. Graham illustrates a disturbing pattern familiar to many survivors: a priest admits to sexual abuse, receives a positive assessment, and is returned to ministry where he could continue to have access to children. Graham’s 1988 admission that he had molested a 14-year-old boy should have resulted in permanent removal from ministry. Instead, Church officials returned him to work — and he was later accused of additional sexual abuse.
For the victims of Graham’s sexual abuse, the institutional failures are particularly stark. When Graham admitted the first allegation, Church officials had documented knowledge of his admitted conduct and the danger it represented to children. Their decision to return him to ministry despite that admission was compounded by their subsequent removal of the restrictions imposed after the second allegation. These institutional choices represent precisely the type of conduct that civil litigation is designed to address.
Massachusetts law may allow survivors to pursue civil claims against dioceses that knowingly returned admitted abusers to positions with access to children. The viability of any individual claim depends on the specific facts and circumstances of each case. Through civil litigation, survivors may be able to seek compensation for the profound harm caused by abuse, while the legal process can compel transparency about the institutional decisions that enabled it. For those who choose to come forward, pursuing civil claims may help bring the full scope of those failures into the public record and hold those responsible to account.
Every survivor deserves compassion and acknowledgment. This video explains how civil law empowers individuals harmed by clergy abuse to pursue accountability and closure. Justice extends beyond courtrooms; it allows survivors to reclaim their voice and aids them on their healing journey. Survivors across Massachusetts continue proving that truth carries strength and healing begins with being heard.
Our experienced and compassionate team of attorneys, investigators, paralegals, and support staff have extensive training in working with sexual abuse victims.
These cases are complex; however, our team are experts in these types of cases and will diligently ensure our clients are compensated for full and fair value. We always do our best to help our clients heal by giving them a voice
and helping them seek a measure of justice.
Massachusetts Disclaimer:Herman Law has a multistate practice representing victims of sexual abuse in civil cases. A Herman Law attorney is licensed to practice law in Massachusetts. Each case is different, and results in prior cases do not assure a similar outcome in future cases. If there is no recovery, no fees or expenses will be charged. Attorney Advertising by Jenny Rossman.
Attorney Advertising Disclaimer
This is an advertisement for legal services. The content provided is for general informational purposes only and may not reflect current legal developments. It is not intended as legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Legal outcomes depend on numerous factors, including specific facts, applicable law, opposing parties, and other circumstances. Do not take action based solely on the information in this advertisement. Every case is different. Any discussion of past results is for illustrative purposes only and does not guarantee or predict similar outcomes in future cases. No statement in this advertisement should be interpreted as a promise or guarantee of results. In the absence of a recovery, no fee will be charged to you and you will not be liable for any litigation expenses.
Attorney-Client Relationship & Confidentiality
Viewing this advertisement, contacting our firm, or requesting a consultation does not create an attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship is only formed through a signed agreement with our firm. Any information shared between you and our firm before an attorney-client relationship is established is not confidential, privileged, or protected from disclosure. If you require immediate legal assistance, please contact our office directly.
Responsibility for Content
This advertisement is sponsored by Herman Law Firm.
Data Collection & Tracking
This advertisement may use tracking technology and allow third parties, including Meta, to collect data from user interactions for advertising and analytics purposes. These third parties may use cookies, web beacons, and similar technologies for targeted advertising. To learn more about data collection practices and opt-out options, visit: https://optout.aboutads.info/?c=2&lang=EN.
Call us: 1 866 850 3766 
call us: 1 866 850 3766 
Message Us 
Call Us